Have you been thinking about buying a house? Property taxes are a major factor to consider, and some counties in the U.S. are notorious for causing residents to flee to greener pastures (with lower tax bills). Here are 18 counties with sky-high property taxes. So, if you’re looking to save a buck or two, you might want to consider moving elsewhere.

Bergen County, New Jersey

Consistently topping the charts with effective rates exceeding 3.0%, Bergen County boasts excellent schools and diverse communities. It’s a haven for families, but a 2023 study by Rutgers University found a net outmigration trend, with residents citing high taxes as a major factor in their decision to leave.

Essex County, New Jersey

Essex County is home to Newark and historic towns and offers a vibrant mix of urban and suburban life. However, effective tax rates well over 3.0% are causing some residents to explore more affordable options. Census data shows a population decline in Essex County between 2020 and 2022, suggesting an outflow of residents.

Union County, New Jersey

Diverse and conveniently located, Union County offers a mix of residential and commercial areas. However, with effective tax rates surpassing 3.0%, it’s not surprising that a 2022 report by NJ.com highlighted the county’s struggle with retaining young families due to the high cost of living, including property taxes.

Nassau County, New York (Long Island)

Long Island living boasts beautiful beaches and affluent communities, but it doesn’t come cheap. Effective rates hovering around 3.0% have led to a decrease in property value growth in recent years, according to a 2023 report by The Real Deal. This, coupled with high taxes, might explain why some residents are seeking more affordable locations.

New York County, New York (Manhattan)

The allure of Manhattan – the iconic skyline, world-class attractions, and vibrant energy – comes at a premium. Effective rates exceeding 3.0% contribute to a high cost of living, and while Manhattan’s population remains dense, a 2022 report by CNBC noted a slowdown in population growth, possibly due to residents seeking more affordable alternatives.

Rockland County, New York

Scenic beauty, strong schools, and close proximity to NYC make Rockland County a dream for many. However, the dream comes with an effective tax rate exceeding 3.0%. A 2021 report by The Journal News found that young families, especially millennials, are leaving Rockland County at a higher rate than previous generations, citing high taxes as a major reason.

Westchester County, New York

Affluent communities, historical sites, and a mix of landscapes define Westchester County. But, tax rates exceeding 3.0% are causing some residents to reconsider the high cost of living. A 2023 report by Westchester Magazine highlighted a trend of residents downsizing their homes within the county to cope with rising property taxes.

Falls Church City, Virginia

This independent city near Washington, D.C., offers historic charm, excellent schools, and a convenient location. And yet rates exceeding 3.0% are causing some residents to explore areas with a lower tax burden. A 2022 report by Virginia Public Radio found that Falls Church City is experiencing an influx of retirees while younger families are opting for more affordable suburbs.

Hunterdon County, New Jersey

Hunterdon County offers a slower pace of life with rolling hills, farms, and charming towns. However, effective rates near 2.5% mean property taxes are still a consideration. While exact data on migration patterns is limited, a 2022 article in The New York Times exploring the “donut effect” around NYC suggests that younger residents priced out of the city might bypass Hunterdon County for even more affordable rural areas.

Morris County, New Jersey

Scenic beauty, strong schools, and historic downtowns make Morris County a desirable location. However, with 2.5% effective rates, many are now exploring locations with a lower property tax burden. A 2023 report by NJ.com highlighted a trend of Morris County residents moving to neighboring Sussex County, which boasts similar charm but with lower taxes.

Passaic County, New Jersey

A mix of industrial areas and vibrant neighborhoods define Passaic County. However, 2.0%, coupled with the high cost of living, is leading some residents to search for areas with a more tax-friendly environment. According to a 2022 report by WNYC, Passaic County is experiencing a trend of gentrification, with young professionals attracted by the lower housing costs compared to nearby areas. However, these newcomers might also be priced out in the long run due to rising property taxes.

Suffolk County, New York (Long Island)

Beaches, wineries, and a mix of suburban and rural areas make Suffolk County appealing. Effective rates approaching 2.5% mean property taxes are a factor, and according to a 2023 report by Newsday, there’s been a decrease in demand for luxury waterfront homes in Suffolk County. This might be due to a combination of high taxes and rising interest rates.

Putnam County, New York

Nature lovers may adore Putnam County’s lakes and outdoor recreation, but effective rates near 2.5% mean property taxes are a concern for some residents. A 2022 article in The Poughkeepsie Journal explores the growing popularity of glamping (glamorous camping) in Putnam County, suggesting a potential rise in short-term rentals catering to tourists who wouldn’t be subject to property taxes.

Orleans County, New York

Agricultural heritage, wineries, and scenic lakefront living are all part of Orleans County’s charm. And yet effective rates hovering around 2.0% mean property taxes are still a consideration. While data on migration patterns is limited, a 2023 report by Buffalo Business First suggests a trend of retirees moving to Orleans County for its peaceful atmosphere and lower cost of living compared to nearby areas. However, rising property taxes mean that this trend might shift even in the near future.

Allegany County, New York

Stunning natural beauty, rolling hills, and charming small towns define Allegany County. However, effective rates near 2.0% mean property taxes are still a significant expense. A 2022 report by WGRZ Buffalo explores the challenges of attracting young families to Allegany County. While the rural setting and lower housing costs compared to urban areas are attractive, high property taxes can negate those benefits.

Monroe County, New York

Home to Rochester, Monroe County offers a mix of urban experiences and access to Lake Ontario. Unfortunately, rates exceeding 2.0% mean property taxes are a burden for some residents. According to a 2023 report by the Rochester Business Journal, there’s been a trend of young professionals leaving Monroe County for neighboring suburbs or smaller cities in New York with a lower cost of living, including property taxes.

Salem County, New Jersey

Southern Jersey charm, agricultural heritage, wineries, and proximity to Delaware Bay make Salem County a rural retreat. However, effective rates exceeding 2.0% mean property taxes are a factor, and according to a 2022 report by NJ.com, there’s been an increase in residents moving to neighboring Cumberland County, which offers a similar rural lifestyle with even lower taxes.

Gloucester County, New Jersey

A mix of suburban and rural areas with a rich history, Gloucester County offers a certain charm. However, effective rates exceeding 3.0%, similar to Bergen County, are causing some residents to search for locations with a lighter property tax burden. A 2023 report by KYW Newsradio Philadelphia highlights Gloucester County as an emerging destination for young families priced out of nearby Philadelphia but warns that the county’s high property taxes could hinder this trend in the long run.

America’s favorite zoos and aquariums are buzzing with change, and everyone’s talking about it. From the San Diego Zoo’s pandas returning to China to SeaWorld ending its orca shows, iconic institutions are rethinking their star attractions. It’s not just about the animals we’ve grown to love; it’s about ethical shifts and pushing for better conservation. As we dive into these transformations, we uncover what they mean for the future of wildlife care and how we learn about the natural world.

San Diego Zoo, California

Once famed for its giant panda exhibit, the San Diego Zoo said farewell to its beloved pandas in 2019 as part of a conservation agreement with China. The departure of Bai Yun and her cub, Xiao Liwu, marked the end of an era for the zoo, which had hosted pandas for over two decades. This change underscores the evolving nature of conservation efforts, emphasizing the return of these iconic animals to their native country to aid in the wild populations’ recovery.

Bronx Zoo, New York

The Bronx Zoo, known for its comprehensive wildlife conservation efforts, made headlines in 2020 when it decided not to keep elephants in captivity anymore. This decision reflected a growing understanding of the complex social and physical needs of elephants, which roam vast distances in the wild. The zoo’s commitment to elephant welfare and conservation in their natural habitats highlights a shift in how zoos prioritize animal needs and natural behaviors.

SeaWorld, Florida

SeaWorld has faced intense scrutiny over the years for its treatment of orcas, leading to a landmark decision in 2016 to end its orca breeding program and phase out live orca shows. This move represented a significant shift in public attitudes toward marine life in captivity and underscored the growing demand for more ethical forms of entertainment. SeaWorld’s focus has since shifted toward conservation and rescue efforts, signaling a new chapter for the marine park.

Monterey Bay Aquarium, California

Renowned for its innovative marine habitats and conservation research, the Monterey Bay Aquarium recently highlighted the challenges of maintaining certain large marine species, such as the great white shark, in captivity. Despite several attempts, the aquarium has faced difficulties providing suitable conditions for these apex predators, emphasizing the complex needs of marine life and the importance of wild conservation efforts.

Philadelphia Zoo, Pennsylvania

One of the oldest in the United States, The Philadelphia Zoo has pioneered creating more naturalistic habitats for its animals. However, it has recognized the limitations of captivity for large species like polar bears, leading to discussions about phasing out their polar bear exhibit. This decision reflects an ongoing reevaluation of how zoos can best serve the interests of both their animal inhabitants and conservation goals.

National Aquarium, Baltimore, Maryland

The National Aquarium announced plans to create a seaside sanctuary for its captive dolphins by 2020, a groundbreaking move in the U.S. aquarium industry. This decision came amid growing ethical concerns about keeping such highly intelligent and social creatures in confined spaces. The sanctuary aims to provide a more natural environment for the dolphins, highlighting a shift toward more humane and conservation-oriented practices.

Smithsonian’s National Zoo, Washington D.C.

The Smithsonian’s National Zoo has long been a leader in global conservation science. However, it has also faced the departure of high-profile residents, including giant pandas, who have underlined the complexities of international conservation partnerships and the shifting landscape of zoo exhibits. These departures offer an opportunity to refocus efforts on conservation and education about species less known but equally important for biodiversity.

Oregon Zoo, Portland, Oregon

Although they’ve been at the forefront of elephant conservation and research, the Oregon Zoo has also acknowledged the evolving standards for elephant care. It has embarked on expansive habitat renovations to provide a more naturalistic living space for its elephants, signaling a shift towards larger, more enriching environments that better meet the needs of these complex creatures.

Shedd Aquarium, Chicago, Illinois

The Shedd Aquarium has made significant strides in animal care and conservation but faces the challenge of presenting large marine species, such as whales, in a manner that meets both educational goals and animal welfare standards. As public awareness grows, so does the dialogue around the feasibility and ethics of keeping such large mammals in aquarium settings.

Cincinnati Zoo, Ohio

The Cincinnati Zoo & Botanical Garden is renowned for its breeding programs, especially for endangered species. However, the zoo has had to reevaluate the presence of certain large and complex animals, such as gorillas, in light of new understanding about their social structures and space needs. These considerations are leading to enhanced habitats and a focus on in-situ conservation efforts.

Dallas Zoo, Texas

The focus on conservation and education remains paramount at the Dallas Zoo, but the zoo has recognized the challenges associated with housing large predators like lions and tigers. Efforts to redesign habitats to mimic natural environments as closely as possible reflect a broader trend towards more ethical animal management and visitor education about wild ecosystems.

Los Angeles Zoo, California

The Los Angeles Zoo has been working to balance visitor experience with the highest standards of animal care, particularly for its elephant population. The debate around elephants in zoos has led to significant habitat improvements and discussions about the future of large animals in urban zoos, emphasizing the need for spaces that allow for natural behaviors and adequate exercise.

Mystic Aquarium, Connecticut

Mystic Aquarium’s involvement in beluga whale research has sparked debate about the balance between educational value and the welfare of these charismatic marine mammals. The aquarium’s efforts to study and conserve beluga whales in captivity are part of a broader conversation about the role of aquariums in marine conservation and the ethical considerations of keeping wild animals in captive environments.

Tampa’s Lowry Park Zoo, Florida

Long celebrated for its interactive exhibits and efforts in wildlife conservation, Tampa’s Lowry Park Zoo recently announced its plans to reevaluate and possibly phase out its elephant program. This decision mirrors a growing trend among zoos considering the ethical implications of keeping large, roaming animals in captivity. The move signifies a broader commitment to animal welfare and conservation, aiming to support elephants in more naturalistic settings and prioritizing their well-being over entertainment value.

Aquarium of the Pacific, Long Beach, California

The Aquarium of the Pacific is at the forefront of marine education and conservation. However, it has faced the challenge of housing its large shark species, prompting a reexamination of how to best provide for these animals while educating the public about their role in ocean ecosystems. Efforts to simulate natural environments in captivity have led to innovative habitat designs. Yet, the conversation continues about the long-term viability and ethics of keeping such large predators in aquariums.