11 U.S. Museums That Might Not Survive the Next Decade

Beloved museums face uncertain futures in America’s cultural landscape due to financial struggles and existential questions. From the bustling streets of New York City to the vibrant neighborhoods of Chicago, these institutions stand as pillars of creativity and history. As society evolves and priorities shift, can these iconic museums adapt and thrive in the next decade?

The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York City

Despite being one of the world’s most iconic cultural hubs, “The Met” has encountered financial hurdles exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. With a reported deficit of over $150 million in 2020, the museum implemented staff layoffs and reduced programs to navigate the crisis. Despite its storied history and vast collection spanning millennia, sustaining operations remains an ongoing concern.

Detroit Institute of Arts, Detroit

A cornerstone of Detroit’s cultural landscape, the DIA confronts economic strains amidst the city’s broader challenges. Despite local efforts, including a voter-approved millage, the museum still faces long-term sustainability issues. The delicate balance between maintaining accessibility and preserving invaluable artworks underscores the DIA’s struggle for financial viability.

The Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, New York City

Renowned for its distinctive architecture and avant-garde collections, the Guggenheim grapples with declining attendance and revenue streams. Pre-pandemic, the museum faced criticism for its reliance on blockbuster exhibitions at the expense of its permanent collection. The Guggenheim’s survival hinges on innovative strategies and community engagement as it adapts to changing visitor preferences and fiscal realities.

The Barnes Foundation, Philadelphia

A testament to one man’s singular vision, the Barnes Foundation houses an unparalleled collection of Impressionist and Post-Impressionist masterpieces. However, ongoing financial challenges and governance issues have cast shadows over its future. Despite efforts to increase revenue through expanded programming and visitor initiatives, sustainability remains a pressing concern.

The Whitney Museum of American Art, New York City

Known for championing contemporary American art, Whitney faces uncertainty amidst the post-pandemic landscape. While its relocation to a new, larger space in 2015 aimed to enhance visitor experiences, sustaining operations in an increasingly competitive cultural milieu presents ongoing challenges. As it navigates evolving cultural trends and financial pressures, Whitney’s ability to thrive in the next decade remains uncertain.

The Museum of Contemporary Art, Los Angeles

A bastion of West Coast creativity, MOCA grapples with financial instability exacerbated by the pandemic. Despite recent efforts to bolster fundraising and streamline operations, the museum’s long-term viability remains a subject of concern. Balancing its role as a cultural beacon with the need for fiscal sustainability poses formidable challenges for MOCA’s leadership.

The National Museum of Women in the Arts, Washington D.C.

Dedicated to celebrating women’s contributions to the arts, NMWA faces financial pressures aggravated by the pandemic’s impact on philanthropic giving. As it seeks to expand its outreach and preserve its mission, the museum confronts the need for sustainable funding models. Navigating these challenges is essential to ensuring women artists’ continued representation and recognition in the cultural landscape.

The Frick Collection, New York City

Housed in a historic Gilded Age mansion, the Frick Collection grapples with financial strains exacerbated by rising operational costs. Despite its prestigious reputation and loyal donor base, the museum has faced criticism for its limited accessibility and reluctance to modernize. As it embarks on a renovation project to enhance visitor experiences, Frick must address fundamental questions of sustainability and relevance.

The Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum, Boston

A testament to one woman’s passion for art and culture, the Gardner Museum faces challenges sustaining its unique legacy. Despite its iconic status and innovative programming, the museum contends with financial constraints that threaten its long-term viability. Balancing preservation with the need for financial sustainability poses complex dilemmas for Gardner’s leadership.

The Museum of the Moving Image, New York City

Dedicated to exploring the art and history of film, television, and digital media, MoMI confronts financial uncertainty amidst a rapidly evolving media landscape. Despite its niche focus and innovative exhibitions, the museum has struggled to attract sustained funding and visitor engagement. As it seeks to redefine its role in a digital age, MoMI must navigate the intersection of art, technology, and finance to ensure its survival.

The National Academy Museum and School, New York City

Founded in 1825, the National Academy faces existential threats amidst financial instability and governance challenges. Despite its rich history and esteemed alums, the museum has grappled with declining attendance and revenue streams. As it seeks to redefine its mission and engage with new audiences, the National Academy’s ability to adapt to changing cultural landscapes will determine its fate in the coming decade.

​​The Museum of Contemporary Art, Chicago

A pillar of the Midwest art scene, MCA Chicago contends with financial pressures exacerbated by the pandemic’s impact on tourism and philanthropy. Despite its commitment to showcasing cutting-edge contemporary art, the museum faces challenges maintaining its diverse programming and community engagement efforts. As it navigates uncertain economic terrain, MCA Chicago must innovate to ensure its continued relevance and sustainability in the coming years.

The American Folk Art Museum, New York City

Celebrating the creativity and cultural heritage of self-taught artists, AFAM grapples with financial constraints and limited visibility. Despite its unique collections and critical acclaim, the museum has struggled to attract the same level of patronage as larger institutions. As it seeks to broaden its audience and secure sustainable funding sources, AFAM faces pivotal decisions in preserving its mission and legacy.

The New Museum, New York City

A trailblazer in contemporary art, the New Museum faces financial challenges amidst the economic downturn and shifting cultural landscapes. Despite its reputation for bold, boundary-pushing exhibitions, the museum relies heavily on earned revenue streams, leaving it vulnerable to fluctuations in visitor traffic. As it strives to maintain its commitment to emerging artists and experimental programming, the New Museum must navigate financial uncertainties while preserving its ethos of artistic innovation.

The Andy Warhol Museum, Pittsburgh

The Warhol Museum, fueled by passion for Andy Warhol, the pop art icon, faces harsh financial realities worsened by the pandemic’s blow to tourism and donations. Despite its heavyweight status as North America’s top single-artist museum, Warhol’s struggling to keep its vast collections and educational initiatives afloat. Adapting to shifting cultural and economic tides is the name of the game. Can it secure lasting funds and captivate diverse crowds to ensure its place in the art world?

17 U.S. Cities with the Fastest Growing Rates of Homelessness

Imagine a country where over 650,000 people have nowhere to call home. That’s the sobering reality in the United States, where on a single night in January 2023, more than half a million people were experiencing homelessness, according to the Department of Housing and Urban Development. But that’s just the tip of the iceberg. This number doesn’t include the millions more who teeter on the brink every year, who are just one missed paycheck or unexpected medical bill away from losing their roof. Get ready for some eye-opening statistics – this is a problem we can’t ignore.

San Francisco, California

Homeless Count (2022): Over 80,000 people experiencing homelessness.

Contributing Factors: Extremely high housing costs, pronounced income inequality, and a complicated approval process for new housing units.

Local Efforts: San Francisco dedicates substantial resources to homelessness initiatives, aiming to expand access to supportive housing with comprehensive services, although high living costs and bureaucratic hurdles persist.

New York City, New York

Homeless Count (2023): Over 64,000 people in the shelter system.

Contributing Factors: The high cost of living, the scarcity of affordable housing, and inadequate supportive services intensify the city’s homelessness issue.

Local Efforts: New York City manages an extensive network of homeless shelters and is actively working to expand permanent supportive housing while tackling mental health and substance abuse issues among the homeless population.

Los Angeles, California

Homeless Count (2023): Over 66,436 unhoused individuals.

Contributing Factors: Exorbitant housing costs, a dire shortage of affordable housing, and prevalent mental health and substance abuse issues.

Local Efforts: The Los Angeles Homelessness Services Authority (LAHSA) leads with a focus on increasing access to emergency shelters, bridge housing, and permanent supportive housing, plus addressing mental health and addiction treatment.

Seattle, Washington

Homeless Count (2023): Over 13,000 people experiencing homelessness.

Contributing Factors: Escalating housing costs and limited mental health and addiction treatment services.

Local Efforts: The Seattle Housing Authority offers various affordable housing programs and rental assistance. The city is also enhancing navigation centers to connect people without homes with services and permanent housing.

Denver, Colorado

Homeless Count (2023): Over 14,000 people.

Contributing Factors: Denver’s economic growth attracts many new residents, exacerbating the affordable housing shortage and straining limited mental health care options.

Local Efforts: The city is investing in affordable housing development and rental assistance alongside programs that provide connections to mental health care and addiction treatment services.

San Jose, California

Homeless Count (2023): Over 10,000 people.

Contributing Factors: The Silicon Valley boom has led to skyrocketing living costs, a lack of affordable housing, and prevalent mental health challenges.

Local Efforts: Santa Clara County is pushing rapid rehousing programs and increasing the stock of affordable housing to help address these challenges.

Phoenix, Arizona

Homeless Count (2023): Over 8,000 people.

Contributing Factors: Rapid population growth has strained housing affordability, alongside a lack of affordable housing options and limited resources.

Local Efforts: Phoenix focuses on homelessness prevention, rapid rehousing, and the development of permanent supportive housing, aiming to offer a comprehensive approach to the crisis.

Las Vegas, Nevada

Homeless Count (2023): Over 6,800 individuals.

Contributing Factors: High housing costs, a shortage of affordable housing, and limited social services.

Local Efforts: Las Vegas, in collaboration with Clark County, is developing a comprehensive plan to increase affordable housing, provide rental assistance, and offer supportive services.

Miami, Florida

Homeless Count (2023): Over 5,500 individuals.

Contributing Factors: High living costs, scarcity of affordable housing, and significant income inequality.

Local Efforts: Miami-Dade County employs a multi-faceted approach, providing emergency shelter, rental assistance, and supportive housing programs.

Austin, Texas

Homeless Count (2023): Over 5,500 individuals.

Contributing Factors: Swift population growth is leading to rising housing costs and a scarcity of affordable housing, compounded by a lack of supportive services.

Local Efforts: Austin and Travis County collaborate on strategies to expand rental assistance programs, create supportive housing units, and address the underlying causes of homelessness.

Portland, Oregon

Homeless Count (2023): Over 5,200 people.

Contributing Factors: A limited supply of affordable housing and lack of access to mental health care, worsened by high poverty rates.

Local Efforts: Portland invests in affordable housing development and

renter assistance programs, with outreach and support services to assist the homeless in transitioning to stable housing.

Honolulu, Hawaii

Homeless Count (2022): Over 4,500 people.

Contributing Factors: High living costs, limited affordable housing, and a scarcity of resources.

Local Efforts: Honolulu is working to expand access to affordable housing and emergency shelters, along with providing job training and supportive services to aid transitions out of homelessness.

Washington, D.C.

Homeless Count (2023): Over 6,000 people.

Contributing Factors: High living costs, a lack of affordable housing, and limited support services.

Local Efforts: The D.C. Interagency Council on Homelessness leads efforts to provide emergency shelter, permanent supportive housing, and outreach programs.

Albuquerque, New Mexico

Homeless Count (2022): Over 1,800 homeless students in Albuquerque Public Schools.

Contributing Factors: High poverty rates, a shortage of affordable housing, and prevalent domestic violence.

Local Efforts: Albuquerque’s Heading Home Coalition coordinates rapid rehousing assistance, supportive housing development, and street outreach to tackle homelessness.

Orlando, Florida

Homeless Count (2023): Over 2,500 people.

Contributing Factors: Rising housing costs, a shortage of affordable housing, and limited social safety net resources.

Local Efforts: The Central Florida Homeless Coalition is spearheading efforts to provide shelter, supportive housing, and services to address the root causes of homelessness.

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Homeless Count (2023): Over 5,700 people.

Contributing Factors: Philadelphia faces a combination of high poverty rates, inadequate affordable housing, and limited access to health services.

Local Efforts: The city of Philadelphia is actively expanding its efforts to provide emergency shelters and permanent supportive housing. There is a strong focus on mental health services and job training programs aimed at aiding the transition out of homelessness. Philadelphia’s comprehensive approach includes street outreach teams that work to engage with homeless individuals directly and connect them to necessary services.

Chicago, Illinois

Homeless Count (2023): Over 5,200 people experiencing homelessness.

Contributing Factors: Chicago’s homelessness is driven by high unemployment rates, systemic poverty, and a significant gap in affordable housing.

Local Efforts: Chicago has implemented several initiatives to reduce homelessness, including the development of affordable housing units and substantial investments in health services and job programs. The city also supports innovative approaches like “Housing First,” which provides homeless individuals with housing without preconditions, alongside access to supportive services aimed at sustainability and self-sufficiency.

18 Small Towns in the U.S. That Are Surprisingly Unsafe

The allure of small-town living is undeniable. Peaceful streets, friendly neighbors, and a slower pace of life all paint a picture of idyllic bliss. But beneath the quaint exteriors of some seemingly picture-perfect towns lurks a very different reality. Here’s a look at 18 small towns in the U.S. that face surprising challenges when it comes to safety.

1. Gary, Indiana

Crime Rate: An alarming 6,446 violent crimes per 100,000 residents.
Safety Status: Ranked 4th worst in the U.S., according to NeighborhoodScout.

Gary’s decline began with the steel industry’s collapse, but its struggles are compounded by high unemployment rates and a significant number of abandoned homes, creating hotspots for criminal activity. The town is actively seeking regeneration strategies to revitalize its economy and community spaces.

2. Camden, New Jersey

Crime Rate: 4,487 violent crimes per 100,000 residents.
Safety Status: 12th worst in the U.S., per NeighborhoodScout.

Camden’s efforts to turn around its image include investing in community policing and new educational facilities. However, despite these efforts, the city still faces challenges with drug-related crime and a lingering reputation that deters economic development.

3. Flint, Michigan

Crime Rate: 4,176 violent crimes per 100,000 residents.
Safety Status: 21st worst in the U.S., according to NeighborhoodScout.

Flint’s issues extend to massive infrastructural deficits and a dwindling population, which strains local resources and complicates efforts to combat crime. The community is engaged in initiatives aimed at rebuilding trust and ensuring cleaner water resources.

4. Stockton, California

Crime Rate: 4,080 violent crimes per 100,000 residents.
Safety Status: 27th worst in the U.S., as per NeighborhoodScout.

The economic recovery in Stockton is hampered by high rates of homelessness and poverty. Innovative programs like Advance Peace are being tested here to reduce gun violence through community engagement and support.

5. East St. Louis, Illinois

Crime Rate: 4,063 violent crimes per 100,000 residents.
Safety Status: Ranked 29th worst in the U.S. by NeighborhoodScout.

East St. Louis suffers from one of the highest poverty rates in the nation, which directly impacts its crime rate. Efforts to improve the situation include boosting local education and youth programs.

6. Birmingham, Alabama

Crime Rate: 4,022 violent crimes per 100,000 residents.
Safety Status: 32nd worst in the U.S., according to NeighborhoodScout.

The remnants of historical inequities are visible in the economic and social fabric of Birmingham, affecting everything from housing quality to job opportunities. Community leaders are focusing on inclusivity and economic diversity to bridge gaps.

7. Memphis, Tennessee

Crime Rate: 4,012 violent crimes per 100,000 residents.
Safety Status: 33rd worst in the U.S. by NeighborhoodScout.

Memphis is employing multifaceted approaches to tackle crime, including youth engagement programs and economic incentives to revitalize poorer neighborhoods, aiming to reduce the incentives for gang recruitment.

8. Compton, California

Crime Rate: 3,881 violent crimes per 100,000 residents.
Safety Status: Ranked 42nd worst in the U.S. by NeighborhoodScout.

Despite a reputation marred by decades of depicted violence, Compton is experiencing a cultural resurgence with new arts programs and community-led urban renewal projects aimed at providing safe and creative outlets for its youth.

9. Savannah, Georgia

Crime Rate: 3,829 violent crimes per 100,000 residents.
Safety Status: Ranked 47th worst in the U.S. by NeighborhoodScout.

Savannah’s bustling tourism sector contrasts sharply with areas experiencing systemic neglect. Community efforts focus on bridging this divide with improved policing and neighborhood revitalization projects.

10. New Orleans, Louisiana

Crime Rate: 3,798 violent crimes per 100,000 residents.
Safety Status: Ranked 50th worst in the U.S. by NeighborhoodScout.

Efforts to balance tourism with local needs include bolstering the police force and enhancing flood defenses to mitigate the impacts of frequent natural disasters, which often exacerbate social and economic instability.

11. Youngstown, Ohio

Crime Rate: 3,782 violent crimes per 100,000 residents.
Safety Status: Ranked 52nd worst in the U.S. by NeighborhoodScout.

Youngstown’s strategy to combat crime involves re-purposing abandoned industrial spaces for new businesses and community centers, aiming to create job opportunities and reduce crime-prone areas.

12. Shreveport, Louisiana

Crime Rate: 3,739 violent crimes per 100,000 residents.
Safety Status: Ranked 55th worst in the U.S. by NeighborhoodScout.

Shreveport’s unique position makes it vulnerable to transitory criminal elements. Local law enforcement is enhancing cross-state collaboration to tackle this issue more effectively.

13. Peoria, Illinois

Crime Rate: 3,723 violent crimes per 100,000 residents.
Safety Status: Ranked 57th worst in the U.S. by NeighborhoodScout.

Peoria is focusing on community policing and providing better social services to address its rising gang violence, with an emphasis on engaging at-risk youth.

14. Atlantic City, New Jersey

Crime Rate: 3,698 violent crimes per 100,000 residents.
Safety Status: Ranked 59th worst in the U.S. by NeighborhoodScout.

With the decline of its casino industry, Atlantic City is diversifying its economy by promoting new sectors like technology and green energy, alongside improving public safety.

15. Wichita Falls, Texas

Crime Rate: 3,682 violent crimes per 100,000 residents.
Safety Status: Ranked 61st worst in the U.S. by NeighborhoodScout.

The dual nature of Wichita Falls, with its urban and rural dynamics, presents unique challenges. Local authorities are focusing on bridging service gaps between these areas to enhance safety.

16. Vallejo, California

Crime Rate: 3,643 violent crimes per 100,000 residents.
Safety Status: Ranked 64th worst in the U.S. by NeighborhoodScout.

Vallejo is actively working to combat gang activity through community outreach programs that offer alternatives to gang involvement, aiming to break the cycle of violence.

17. Lake Charles, Louisiana

Crime Rate: 3,598 violent crimes per 100,000 residents.
Safety Status: Ranked 67th worst in the U.S. by NeighborhoodScout.

Post-Hurricane Laura, Lake Charles is focused on rebuilding and strengthening community resilience to withstand future disasters better and reduce crime spikes during recovery periods.

18. Wilmington, Delaware

Crime Rate: 3,582 violent crimes per 100,000 residents.
Safety Status: Ranked 69th worst in the U.S. by NeighborhoodScout.

Efforts in Wilmington to address crime include improving access to quality education and healthcare, particularly in underserved communities, to foster a safer, more equitable city.